Today, on May 25, 2021, MEP Irena Joveva hosted a round table on the position of young people in society, social challenges and the situation after the corona crisis. Participants at the round table were: Ronja Gorenc Didanovič — student and vice-president of the European Youth Parliament Slovenia; Tea Jarc — president of the “Mladi plus” trade union; Tadej Jezernik — student and head of the tender preparation at the organization of Slovenian student clubs ŠKIS; Nik Prebil — MP of the LMŠ party and Vice-Chairman of the Committee of the European Union for Foreign Affairs; Marjan Šarec — MP and the leader of the LMŠ party. Together they were seeking for answers on how to solve the social situation of young people in Slovenia and how to approach young people at the European level and explain to them how the EU can help. MEP Renew Europe and a member of the Executive Board of the Conference on the Future of Europe, Guy Verhofstadt also contributed to the debate with a video.

MEP Irena Joveva was concerned by the fact that 75-and-more-years-olds explain their views on the future. With all due respect to the elderly, in this case, we must first look at the situation of young people today and then look ahead, together: “The recently launched Conference on the Future of Europe project is a great opportunity to review the situation, find solutions and, of course, implement them.” Guy Verhofstadt also presented the functioning and motives of the Conference on the Future of Europe, pointing out that the world is changing very fast. These changes of the coming decades are leading to an entirely new society of Europe: “Europe will not survive this century if it does not change and reform.” Marjan Šarec said that the participation of young people in politics was important, as was the awareness that they can only change something with politics: “Political parties must put young people on eligible places of the candidate lists and offer them the opportunity to prove themselves. If they do not get that opportunity, they cannot show everything they are capable of. Questions about young people can only be addressed successfully in a party that has an overview of all topics. One issue parties are not successful in this, that is why each party must have young people in its ranks.”

Ronja Gorenc Didanovič pointed out that the knowledge of the functioning of Europe and institutions among young people is still relatively poor, which is also due to the feeling of young people’s distancing from decision-making processes. “It all starts in the education system – if you educate young people from an early age about the importance of politics, they are more receptive to its messages. On the contrary, they equate it with partisanship, power struggles and disputes, instead of thinking of it as a broader system and something that affects our everyday lives.” It bothers her that the young people are only being asked about youth issues, instead of being actively included as participles in decision-making processes. Meanwhile, Tea Jarc pointed out that young people are also socially active and responsible in non-political ways; therefore, civil society should be included in politics: “We have an above-average share of young people who are volunteers and want to help in this way. They are more open to diversity, acceptance and solidarity. Sometimes young people also fight in the streets and protests responding to what the country is changing into.” She is concerned that young people are always the losers of crises, as irregular forms of employment make them the first to lose their jobs and consequently, they have problems with housing or creating a family: “Employment of young people for an indefinite period, on-the-job training, mentoring programs and confidence that young people are not an expense, but an investment should be encouraged.” Hence, the treasury is being filled, added value created, recovery and economic growth, Tea Jarc added.

Tadej Jezernik sees good and accessible opportunities in European programs and policies for young people, but they need to be presented in a better way and moved closer to them. The housing problem is a huge issue: “We have many empty flats and at the same time flats with rents rising to the sky, completely inaccessible to young people, as it all starts with how much money they can spend on housing. At the time of the pandemic, we were oppressed and left at the mercy of financial government measures.” Gorenc Didanovič also pointed out the fact that many young people, who lived an independent life before the pandemic, were forced to return to their rooms at their parents’ house. She describes the reaction of the current government to the plight of young people as offensive.

As a representative of the younger generation of politicians, Nik Prebil pointed out the fact that not all politicians are the same, which can be best demonstrated by work: “Decision-makers have to prepare appropriate policies that will be effective in the long term. Slovenia needs quality jobs with high added value. We will soon go through a green breakthrough and digital transformation, and some jobs will be lost or need to be transformed.” He said it was good for young people to study and gain experience abroad, but politics must create interesting and attractive conditions to make them come back.

The interlocutors agreed that the key problem is the underestimating and patronizing attitude towards young people and insincere communication. MEP Joveva concluded the event by saying that the principle “nothing about young people without young people” should be upheld.

 

 “Really, you’re a journalist? That rules! And where?”

“At STA.”

“…”

“The Slovenian Press Agency.”

“Oh … OK.”

This is how many conversations took place when – a decade and a few months ago, on the year of its 20th anniversary (which is also explained in the photo below) – I started my first ‘serious’ job. This does not mean that I am ashamed of the previous ones or that they are worth anything less, but they were typical student jobs, from various promotions of different products in shopping malls to restaurant work. Honestly, this one also started when I was still a student. Nonetheless, it was different. It was special.

Many people did not know and even still do not know about the Slovenian Press Agency. One does not know everything that STA is and everything it gives, that is why the “oh, OK” up there. Because many people do not pay attention when they open a web portal and do not notice that STA is (co)signed under a huge number of articles. Because many people do not know that STA is the one with the collected daily forecasts of events in the country and around the world, which comes handy to any other media as well as to the interested public. Because many people are not aware that STA is a pillar of Slovenia journalism. The foundation of everything.

If STA falls, the key information source in the country falls. All other media fall (by that I mean the media in the true sense of the word). Democracy falls. Freedom falls.

Yes, I was a journalist at STA. And it really did “rule”. At STA I have learned speed but accuracy. At STA I have learned correctness but being no less critical. At STA I have learned comprehensible reporting on complex content. I have said many times that I could not have wished for a better springboard for everything else that followed. My former colleagues are professionals in the true sense of the word.

Not only do they not deserve what is happening to them under the current government, the society as a whole does not deserve it. STA is not “only” a public media service. STA is a symbol of Slovenian independence, which – like our country – is on the threshold of its 30th years of existence. With the difference, that it is not certain how and if they will experience it at all.

Because we have come to the point where the government does not want to pay its funds for public service in violation of the law! When they deliberately, shamelessly procrastinate with cynical manoeuvres such as asking the European Commission if these funds can be paid off at all. Of course, it was clear in advance (to them as well) that the answer from Brussels would be affirmative, but even that did not stop the government’s manipulations and lies, and above all the continuation of the STA’s financial exhaustion. Again: an illegal one.

We have reached the point where one irrevocably resigned minister is primitively mocking the fact that citizens are now starting to raise funds for the Slovenian Press Agency with the help of the Slovene Association of Journalists.

We have come to the point where, unfortunately, I can write without a hint of bad conscience that this government is making fun of everything and everyone. When experts are lecturing about the media (perhaps it will be more understandable if I translate: salting the mind) for the one and only truth that must be completely adapted to the boss. However, the bigger problem than this boss are those who are present and are quiet. An even bigger problem, however, are those who are ignorant.

We have reached the peak of not only a war with the media but specifically a war to control them. Today is World Press Freedom Day, and if ever, it is sadly more than clear today that media freedom is also being threatened in democratic societies. Yes, also in Slovenia. A climate of hatred towards journalists is being created systematically, attempts are being made to subdue and/or suppress all those who do not like the ruling party, fear and the feeling of helplessness of people are exploited systematically, and attention is being distracted systematically from real issues. A goal-driven process is only escalating. All of this is packed in the narrative that they are talking about media pluralism, while not lagging behind fictions like this that critical media is associated with the ghosts of the past. It is not a right-left political battle, as they are trying to portray it, but on the one hand a model of a democratic liberal society with critical independent media and on the other a model of authoritarian state abduction by the party and complete subordination of the media space.

Certain European legislation does exist, such as the Audiovisual Media Services and Copyright Directives. The problem is that they are still not implemented in all national legislations. There are also acts on digital services and the digital market that will set clear rules for moderating content on online platforms. Separately, the European Commission has several tools to put pressure on member states and these often collide with ‘real-policy’ in the Council, and often can not be applied to the media sector. This is exactly what could be changed with the new European legislation on media freedom. In the meantime …

The Slovenian Press Agency must continue to exist, while it must become clear to everyone that we will never be able to eradicate manipulations and lies. However, we can no longer give them space, we do not believe them and we no longer give them the opportunity to come to power. Never again.

Public media are the foundation of any democratic society. This role is more than justified by the STA, and this record was created mainly because the work and people at STA do not deserve an “oh, OK” but one big, the biggest “that rules!”

Irena Joveva

Photo: MMC RTV SLO/Miloš Ojdanić

On Wednesday, 7 April 2021, MEP Irena Joveva participated in the online debate “The Pandemic, Youth, and Europe: how to prevent a lost generation?” organized by the European Parliamentary Association. In their discussion, young Europeans focused on preventing long-term mass youth unemployment and filling the skills gap that will result from the disruption of the traditional learning process.

The pandemic is reducing young people’s opportunities for education and employment. Increasingly, we hear that the ‘lock down’ generation is the lost generation. MEP Joveva agreed with the young people that it is really hard to be 20 years old at this time. “It must be a challenge to be isolated with no real social contact and getting their education through distance learning.” She began by pointing out that education is a Member State competence, meaning that countries have faced the challenges of the pandemic differently. But this does not mean that nothing is being done at the European level.

“At the beginning of the epidemic, in the so-called first wave, when we didn’t know much about the virus, the only right thing to do was to close educational institutions. No one knew how long it would last, for how long the distance learning would be needed, or what the effects of this kind of teaching would be. Today we witness that European education systems have many shortcomings.” Joveva agreed that the pandemic has also led to a lack of social skills development and increased psychological consequences and inequalities. “Since before the pandemic we in Parliament have been working on promoting IT skills, STEM education (science, technology, engineering, and maths), volunteering, internships, exchange programmes … Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps are excellent examples of how we are trying to bridge the gap between traditional schooling by teaching international competences, encouraging practical work, and opening up new horizons.”

Joveva also emphasized that digital education is crucial as it represents an investment in the future and the development of individuals and society. In October, the Commission, which has been working on education reform and Union-level guidelines since before the pandemic, presented its Digital Education Action Plan. It is in the common interest of all EU Member States to fully exploit the potential of education as a driving force for job creation, economic growth and the transition to the digital economy, and for greater social cohesion, especially in the light of the ongoing crisis we are facing momentarily.

Participants agreed that during the pandemic we all became (even more) aware of the importance of volunteering. Joveva, who was shadow rapporteur for the European Solidarity Corps, said that Parliament was working to further improve volunteering opportunities. The new European Solidarity Corps programme will be more accessible, more inclusive, and will provide more safety and security for participants, additionally, online volunteering was also highlighted.

“National agencies can invoke force majeure clauses. This will allow them to assess the possibility of accepting additional costs up to the maximum grant amount. It also allows them to postpone planned activities for up to 12 months per project. The Commission has also secured €100 million for the Digital Education Call for Schools, which will support projects in school education, vocational education, and higher education. The aim of this call will be to improve online, distance, and blended learning – including support for teachers and tutors.”

Despite the complexity of the topics discussed, the young people concluded the debate with optimism, and were especially pleased to have had the opportunity to share their experiences and reflections with the two MEPs. In addition to Joveva the young MEP Alexander Bernhuber (EPP) from Austria also took part in the discussion.

El Confidencial, a Spanish newspaper and website specializing in economic, financial, and political news, has published an interview with MEP Irena Joveva. Below you can find summary of the discussion:

Irena Joveva was a journalist for eight years, so she knows and understands very well the campaign against the freedom of the press that the Janez Janša government is waging in her country. “We cannot afford to have three illiberal countries in the European Union,” she says in an interview with El Confidencial as part of the “Decoding the European Parliament” project. In the interview, the young, Renew Europe MEP talks about the rule of law in the European Union and Slovenia, a country following the illiberal trend of Hungary and Poland. However, Joveva is confident that the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the EU, starting on July 1st this year, will be well managed.

Slovenia has been under scrutiny in recent months due to its situation of the rule of law. How would you sum up the situation of fundamental rights and freedoms in the country?

I wouldn’t say that Slovenia is like Hungary or Poland at the moment. Not everything is as black as it seems, but it is darker than it should be. This is why it is important to talk about Slovenia. The situation of fundamental rights is deteriorating and, if we don’t stop it, Slovenia could be the next Hungary or Poland within a year. This is not purely a national policy, confronting the coalition and the opposition. The general situation in the country is horrible – since Janez Janša came to power many civil society organizations have been facing serious problems. Brussels is paying a little more attention to what is happening now, as Slovenia will take over the EU Council Presidency in July. In summary, the Slovenian government is following the example of Hungary and Poland. They are using all means at their disposal to eliminate free and critical thinking. Not just against journalists, but also against NGOs, universities, and anyone else who disagrees with them. The government insults them, discredits them and uses mechanisms such as withdrawal of funding or legislative measures against them.

You mentioned the coming Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the EU, starting July 1st. Do you see this as an opportunity to improve the situation in the country or is this a bad moment for the EU?

I think everything will be fine in the end. But I hope that in these months leading up to the Presidency, European institutions will not be passive, saying that there is nothing they can do. This is not true. I think they have learnt from the mistakes they made in the past with Hungary and Poland. But I believe that the Presidency itself will not be badly run.

The European Parliament held a debate on the attempts by the governments of Poland, Hungary and Slovenia to silence free media. Do you think that the freedom of the press is at risk in these countries?

Yes. Slovenia is not yet Hungary or Poland, but if we do nothing, it will head that way. Before entering politics, I was a journalist for eight years. So, I know how things work on the other side. There is no doubt that the situation is worsening. While I cannot claim that pressures or attacks have never happened in the past, the fact is that with the new government, the situation is gradually deteriorating. Janša tried to suspend the Slovenian Press Agency and national public television RTV SLO because he had built his own media system. He also has issues with the culture because they are trying to create a kind of parallel social trend. He manipulates people through historical traumas and the current pandemic. The goal is obvious: they want to subjugate the whole of society, and they want to have power eternally. Janez Janša wants to be eternally in power, that’s the whole issue here. He deliberately tried to divide and polarize society to achieve his political goals. And his political goal is autocracy.

In fact, in the last few weeks, we have seen the Prime Minister directly attack journalists here in Brussels, where he is known as the “Trump of Europe”. Do you think this label is fair?

I am not in a position to judge whether that is fair or not. But the reality is  Janša idealizes Trump and Orban. He uses social networks a lot, he attacks everyone on Twitter, so he uses the same methods as Trump. Things are going to extremes because we are no longer just talking about rhetoric.

You personally have been the target of attacks due to your Macedonian origin. What was happening?

This is normal for Janez Janša, his voters, and his supporters. Unfortunately, I am not the only one and, of course, I will not be the last to be the target of such attacks. It’s sad because none of them have told me exactly what I did wrong or what they think I should have done better. They are only talking about where my parents are from, even though I was born in Slovenia, by the way. They don’t even care what I say, and that is what saddens me the most. Politics has led to a very offensive trend. Hate speech in particular is becoming normal, most notably on Twitter.

Do you think the European Commission is doing enough to curb these trends and defend the rule of law?

I think the Commission should do more because it has enough tools at its disposal to do so. I hope they will take steps in the right direction because we cannot afford to have three illiberal countries in the EU that do not believe in freedom of the press. Furthermore, I hope and trust the European Commission to do more.

What measures or tools do you think Brussels could use?

First, we need to stop talking about how bad we are all the time and take action. The Commission has annual country reports on the rule of law, as well as a mechanism to condition European funding on respect for these fundamental values. It is a crucial instrument, and we must start using it to punish those who undermine our values.

Do you have confidence in the rule of law? We have already seen that some, such as Article 7, have proved ineffective …

You never know, but I remain optimistic because the rule of law mechanism is necessary precisely because of the apparent ineffectiveness of other mechanisms. The European Union was founded based on fundamental values, and this is clearly reflected in the Treaties. This is not about ideologies, but about non-negotiable values. The governments of Poland and Hungary are constantly losing court battles before the EU Court of Justice. I believe that we can use these tools to ensure that European taxpayers’ money does not go to waste.

You mentioned Janša’s admiration for Viktor Orbán. Do you think he will follow in Orban’s footsteps and his party, SDS, will end up leaving the European People’s Party?

I don’t think he will dare to do that because then his party would have less power than it has now as a member of the EPP. My colleague from Janša’s party has already said on camera that she will continue to work with Fidesz, regardless of which political group she belongs to. Orban and Janša no longer have so much political power, not in Parliament, or more importantly in the Council. They will not be part of “mainstream” politics. Janša’s party is simply too small (at the European level) to do anything, especially now that Fidesz is no longer in the EPP. So, I don’t think they will leave the group, but they will continue to work with Orban’s party.

And one last question. Are these illiberal democracies a threat to the future of the EU?

Yes. We do not need three illiberal democracies, even if they are still a minority. What is most important now is to stop the spread of such democracies.

 

Journalist: Maria Zornoza

Published: El Confidencial, 23rd March 2021

Full article accessible here.