In this time’s IG Live conversation Call me Irena held on Friday, 4 March 2022, MEP Irena Joveva hosted Uroš Velepec, former head coach of the Slovenian national biathlon team who is now working with the Ukrainian national team. They talked about biathlon and sport in general, and especially about the current war in Ukraine, as Velepec’s protégés have been conscripted into the army. “Nobody thought that someone could start such bloodshed, which serves no one any good”, said Velepec clearly, not mincing his words about the Russian president or his supporters and about the sanctions on athletes: “They are to blame for not speaking up. If you live in a country where you are not allowed to speak your mind, then that country is worth nothing.”

Velepec started by answering a question about how he ended up with the Ukrainian national biathlon team, and described the popularity of biathlon in Ukraine, saying that it is “the unrivalled number one winter sport”. He then touched on the recently concluded Winter Olympic Games in Beijing, where he, too, was present. He stressed that he is very happy for Slovenian athletes and their excellent results and that their successes were an inspiration for him as well.

Most of the questions were related to the current situation in Ukraine, where war is raging as a result of Russian aggression. Velepec admitted that he is very emotional about it. “So far, female athletes have only been called up, but their male counterparts are fighting, mainly in those places where it is currently the worst. There are 14 of them in my team, and I spend more time with them than with my family.” He said that talking to them is very difficult, and the worst thing is if there is no response for a while, because he imagines the worst. He tries to help as much as he can, although he constantly feels there is more he could do. “People talked about it during the Olympics, but nobody thought that it would come to this, that someone could start such bloodshed, which serves no one any good and goes against all logic,” he added.

Biathletes are usually employed in the army, and he himself was part of the Slovenian Armed Forces sports unit for 25 years. “These jobs are great in peacetime. No one in my team ever thought they would ever have to pick up a weapon save in competition,” he said.

He and the MEP shared the wish that the situation would calm down as soon as possible. When asked about Russian president Vladimir Putin, Velepec’ answer was very direct:

“He is definitely a tyrant. I would suggest to the Russophiles who support him – and there are some in Slovenia – to go and live in Vladivostok or Novosibirsk and see what it is like to live on $25 a month. People there are oppressed, this is not a fairy tale. I have been to Russia several times and I know how people live there.”

In his opinion, Putin dislikes democracy, which will sooner or later bring an end to his regime, too. Velepec was also clear in his support for sanctions on Russian (and Belarusian) athletes, specifically biathletes:

“These sanctions may make them grumble back home that they cannot pursue their profession because the international public is against them and that they are not to blame for anything. They are to blame for not speaking up. /…/ If you live in a country where you are not allowed to speak your mind, either stupid or clever, then that country is worth nothing.”

Joveva and her guest also discussed the future of Russian and Ukrainian biathletes in competitions, the possibility of post-war trauma, the interconnection between politics and sport, and, not least, Velepec revealed his favourite biathlon location.

Finally, they both hoped that as few lives as possible would be lost and that next time – as soon as possible – they would talk about how the Ukrainian national biathlon team is training in Slovenia and that everyone is alive and well. Velepec concluded the conversation by expressing his gratitude to Slovenes for their response and help to Ukrainians.

You can watch the full recording of the conversation on MEP Joveva’s Instagram profile.

 

It was 1991. Yes, Slovenia had become an independent and sovereign country and no, it was not easy. I believe and I know that what was happening then was of the utmost importance. But … is it really necessary to drag that year up again and again, every single time, and use it for all sorts of comparisons? Every. Single. Time.

It is 2022. Yes, this is the 21^st century, and no, the Soviet Union no longer exists. It collapsed many years ago. It cannot be restored. Though … someone would like nothing more. Someone is using the 19^th century methods and basing their views and – even worse – actions on twisted and misguided theories of history. Because of fear of democracy.

It will be 2050. Yes, that is when Europe is supposed to become the first carbon-neutral continent, and no, 2050 is no longer that far off. It is closer than 1991! THIS IS THE FUTURE.

The future cannot be someone who is stuck in the past. In days gone by. The future cannot be someone who sees everything and everyone as enemies. If there are none, they will make some (up), because they simply cannot function otherwise.

Yes, the future is nations freely choosing their own destiny, and no, I am not just talking about the people of Ukraine. But I will continue with them, because today we are holding an extraordinary plenary session to debate the Russian aggression against Ukraine. We are set to adopt a resolution. I expect it to be tough. We will demand even more determined sanctions against the Putin regime, but also against the Lukashenka regime, which is supporting the attack on Ukraine. The oligarchs who support the Russian regime must no longer be able to buy palaces in London and spend their summers on yachts in the Mediterranean. I expect financial and political isolation. The unity of the EU.

Unity which, by the way, I would expect in many other important areas as well. Whereas what traditionally happens is that there is always someone who starts asserting their own interests and who thinks that they can do whatever they – and they alone – please in this community. Even at the cost of trampling on a fundamental value such as the rule of law. I mention this because this is what it is all about. Whichever way you look at it, this is the fundament on which the EU stands or falls.

This is also why this was the central theme of our conversation last week, when Stephane Sejourne, president of my political group, Renew Europe, visited Slovenia. He came to express his support for all those of us/you who understand that change is needed.

Change is also needed, for example, in the media sphere. Not that the media themselves should change (I am, of course, referring to those worthy of the name, not to propaganda). What I am saying is that decisionmakers should strain every sinew to improve the situation. Free and critical media are indispensable for holding authorities to account. For democracy. And, ultimately, for peace. This is what we discussed during yesterday’s event on media freedom in the EU.

My basic thesis was that Russia could and can attack because the Russian media (both private and public), or, more precisely, their editorial policy, act as an extension of the government, even if the government’s instructions are absurd. They don’t care. They don’t care that Russian propaganda is telling its people that Russia is only conducting a ‘military operation in Ukraine’ in order to ‘oust the Nazis who are depriving the Ukrainian people of their freedom’. But … in the information age of social networks, presenting alternative facts will not be possible forever.

No one is eternal. Truth be told, I wouldn’t mind if the Russian president, who has ruled for 20 years and is even bombing civilians, were swept away by a democratic wave. It’s about time. For a change. In Russia and … elsewhere.

And in April too. 🤞

– Irena

Today, on 28 February 2022, the Savus newspaper published an interview with MEP Irena Joveva and Marjan Šarec, the LMŠ President. You can read it in full below:

Joveva, who was elected from the LMŠ party list, comes from Jesenice. She lives and breathes the values such as honesty, work and solidarity. In Brussels, she is actively co-shaping policies that enable development and a fair transition for regions such as Zasavje, and she is energetically addressing the issues that matter to young people. In the former Yugoslavia, the Jesenice ironworks was one of the important industrial centres. You could say that you come from a place that resembles Zasavje as it used to be.

My father worked in the Acroni steel mill for 40 years, my mother was a cleaner. I am proud of the fact that I come from a working-class family. In a difficult economic situation, my parents searched for a new opportunity in a new environment, starting practically from scratch. They could not spoil me as a child as they simply didn’t have the means for that, but they nevertheless gave me everything. I believe that a working-class background is a good foundation for a healthy attitude to life, because it helps you keep your feet on the ground, in touch with people’s real problems… And yes, it is probably very similar in Zasavje.

Is work still a value?

You know, due to new forms of work and turbulent labour market conditions, it may sometimes seem it is not, but it is. Work most certainly still is a value. At the European level, we have been working very hard over the last two years to ensure that every EU citizen can get a quality job with adequate pay. But providing adequate pay is also linked to providing appropriate education. The resolutions that we are adopting address the potential of the education system in the sense that that the goal of education will not be to get a degree just for the sake of it, but that there will be an increasing focus on vocational and professional education and lifelong learning. Work is and always will be a value. Above all, every type of work deserves respect, and workers should be appreciated and properly rewarded for it.

Innovative stories are being created in Zasavje, too. Here you will find high-tech companies that are becoming important players on the global market, but they are always faced with staffing challenges. This is also because the road to Zasavje, which is in the heart of Slovenia, seems like a road to the end of the world. Everything simply cannot be done remotely. 

We may be aiming for a digital society, but that does not mean that basic infrastructure can be neglected on that account. People need high-speed broadband internet, but they need good public transport connections just as much and, ultimately, modern road connections, including the never-realised tunnel link to the Štajerska motorway. I am convinced that, if this link existed, investors would be keen to exploit the advantages of Zasavje and bring their companies to the region. In this respect, the current Slovenian Government should, first and foremost, make use of the European funds available, primarily from the Just Transition Fund, but also from complementary sources at the national level.

Zasavje very much counts on grants available to coal regions in transition …

… And these funds are not scarce. A total of EUR 538 million will be allocated to Slovenia. The inclusion of your region, alongside the Savinjska region, was one of the greatest achievements of Marjan Šarec’s government. It is true that the scope of programmes for drawing on these funds is limited by the regulation, but there are still many opportunities for using them in a productive manner. At the same time, this allows for the setting of a long-term strategy for the region’s development in terms of green transformation, which must also be based on economic development. To that end, it is essential to have a good vision of the kind of Zasavje you are aiming to achieve. If, after the mining activity was discontinued, the region was left with a surplus workforce and the economy developed rather haphazardly, Zasavje now has an opportunity and a chance to chart a clear development path for itself. Should it strengthen its crafts and business sectors? Attract investors, achieve a breakthrough with high-tech companies? How should it attract the workforce it needs? Does it provide for the necessary housing, schools, kindergartens, what quality of life does it offer? What do the people living here want? Is the local administration able to come up with good projects for the absorption of the development funds that will actually contribute to the region’s growth? All these are tasks that you, the people of Zasavje, have to set for yourselves, and this is what will determine the success of the development strategies and the future of Zasavje. But there is no doubt that the EU will provide substantial help in making these plans a reality.

The future will be highly electrified, and we still haven’t decided which sources we intend to get our electricity from. In Hrastnik, the largest solar power plant in Slovenia has already been built on degraded mining land, and another one is planned.

We can no longer turn a blind eye to the energy crisis. We are in the middle of it. As our electricity consumption grows, we will have to decide which sources will be used for its production. My compliments to the region and the municipality of Hrastnik. Zasavje used to be an energy region once, now it can become a good practice example of the transition to a low-carbon society. There is a political consensus in Slovenia that, in addition to the construction of a new nuclear power plant unit, we urgently need significantly bigger investment in renewable energy sources in order to secure a stable source of energy. In my view, solar energy makes by far the most sense for Slovenia. In addition, the price of solar panels is declining sharply and it is already cheaper than energy produced from other sources. In parallel, this will reduce our need to import raw materials, such as gas. Furthermore, from the point of view of the European legislation, the current investments in solar energy will quickly be recouped because of the polluter pays principle, which is reflected, for example, in the price of emission allowances.

How do you see Slovenia in 20 years? What happened to the dream of becoming the new Switzerland and could we become the Silicon Valley of Europe?

Above all, I see Slovenia as a country where, I hope, the new generation of politicians will be better than – pardon the expression – the current old set. I’m not referring to the new generation that learns its ways primarily from the current power structures, but the one that fights against them. I’m referring to the generation that is aware that it must decide its own future. Young people are becoming more and more politically active and they really can change many things for the better, but they need to be given the chance and taken seriously, because they are not trying to rub anyone up the wrong way, they are fighting for the right cause. After all, they are also fighting for my daughter, who, of course, is not yet able to do so herself in this way, and I hope that – precisely because of the young people who are active now – in 20 years’ time she will not even have to. We have a wonderful country, let it become development-oriented country, a country that is breaking new ground, and, above all, let those at the top take care of their citizens. That is what I want today, tomorrow and in 20 years’ time.

Yet young people are leaving in large numbers. Zasavje, in particular, has a very poor demographic profile.

Youth emigration is a problem faced by many EU countries. It reflects the ambition and desire of young people to build a quality life for themselves. Most often, they leave during or immediately after their studies, when they go out into the world to gain new knowledge and experience. If they return, this is beneficial to their home country, but this depends on the country’s attractiveness and the adequacy of the living conditions. It depends, in particular, on whether the country is successful in tackling housing issues and astronomical rents, in providing adequate education, offering quality and flexible jobs, creating the right conditions for young families, etc. The current government is doing a poor job in youth policy as a whole, which was even more pronounced during the pandemic. This is unacceptable. Creating good conditions for young people and investing in them is an investment in a positive future.

We find ourselves in a super-election year. How does Brussels view political developments in Slovenia?

Concerns did not vanish with the end of Slovenia’s Presidency of the Council of the EU. We are no longer in the forefront to the same extent, but this does not mean that Brussels is unaware of the situation in our country. Everyone hopes for a change to happen and is counting on it happening in April. But the change cannot happen in Brussels; we have to take care of it at home. The claim that all politicians are equally bad, that we are all the same, is not true. Nor is it true that elections do not change anything. You know what really cannot bring about any change? Abstaining from elections. That is why I really want to see a high voter turnout and people realising how important it is for them to go out and vote and to use the power they have. Because they really can demonstrate power.

Marjan Šarec: “You can be an example to us all”

The people of Zasavje are considered to be upright, determined and persistent. It is the tradition of mining that has shaped you this way. Now, you are becoming a globally competitive knowledge hub, a crossroads for new, innovative and clean technologies that not only open up new jobs with higher value added, but are also attractive to young people. This is a great success that cannot be ignored. At the same time, you have driven a major polluter out of your valley. You can be an example to us all.

Last November, when I visited Zasavje with Deputy Rudi Medved, I said that all potentials for the development of your region should be exploited, and that it is essential that all municipalities work together, overcoming the silo mentality, to make more efficient use of the European funds available. The establishment of provinces, which the LMŠ supports, would certainly help to achieve this.

Our Party’s guiding principle is that we build on reality, not illusions. We don’t make big promises, but our promises are realistic, which we try to deliver on. The slogan “Normalisation. Solutions. Development.” confirms this. We have shown – both when in power and opposition – that “we walk the talk” and that the main motives of our political engagement are to co-create a different and better future and to stand up for a fair and better regulated country, our homeland.

Today, on 23 February 2022, MEP Irena Joveva hosted a virtual round table entitled A Vision for a RENEWed European Union as the closing event of a two-day working visit by Stéphane Séjourné, President of the Renew Europe political group in the European Parliament, an MEP and a close associate of French President Emmanuel Macron. Marjan Šarec, LMŠ party president, also participated in the discussion alongside the two hosts, both MEPs, Irena Joveva and Klemen Grošelj.

Initially, everyone present stressed the importance of the April elections in Slovenia, Hungary and also in France. “These are key moments for Europe because national elections are also European elections, which we and the electorate must be aware of. However, the French elections are slightly different as we are trying to re-elect the same president, while you want to find an alternative to the existing government. Nevertheless, I see similarities in particular in terms of the kind of society we want, open or closed,“ Stéphane Séjourné said, noting the importance of liberalism, the power of civil society and the significance of the free market. Marjan Šarec believes that the elections in any Member State affect the stability of the whole European Union, saying, “If one link in the chain is problematic in this regard, it affects everyone. At the moment, Slovenia is among the three problematic countries, which is why elections are so important.” He added that the election on 24 April will be actually a referendum on the kind of country we want to live in. He believes it is crucial for people to exercise their right to vote, because every single vote counts. Irena Joveva also considers European values to be key for the future, which Renew Europe also strongly advocates:

“Our political group is very heterogeneous. We frequently have different views, but we are really united when it comes to the main issues. These are our values. Our principles. The fact that we are unwavering in defending and strengthening European values, the rule of law, civil liberties, fundamental rights, that we are fighting injustice and discrimination, for the freedom of the media… In the European Parliament, we are practically always the ones who tip the scales one way or the other in the decision-making process.”

Stéphane Séjourné added that Renew Europe is addressing the priorities that are at the heart of the political debate about democracy and economic recovery. In the wake of the health crisis, a new development model will have to be drawn up to enable Europe to be competitive over the next 15 years. The US and China are also investing heavily in development. At the same time, Renew Europe is also working to maintain the rule of law, as well as bringing social and democratic issues to the fore. According to Šarec, Renew Europe is also facing a great responsibility, as the EU needs a liberal centre in the wider area, and at the same time he expressed his satisfaction about the work and international visibility of MEPs Joveva and Grošelj.

Green policy and sustainable solutions are also among Renew Europe’s main priorities. Séjourné said they wanted to achieve radical decarbonisation and strike the right balance while at the same time adopting the right measures to help the economy. For Grošelj, the biggest challenge in terms of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 is securing sufficient investments in research and development, which is also one of the anchors of the LMŠ programme. “The research and development findings need to be translated into new technologies that will spur new ideas, create new high-quality jobs, and provide high personal income that will be sustainable, as well as public education and public health. In doing this, the European Parliament will play an extremely important role; it will set a common legal framework, and this will be a driver of further development and progressive policies.”

Speakers also touched on the rule of law. Grošelj believes that it is the cornerstone of the European Union, but some leaders are tearing it down, so regulators must invent ever-new regulations. Séjourné highlighted the functioning of the independent media and the judiciary:

“If the media is not free and judges – who decide on election-related appeals – are not free, then the election cannot not be fair.”

In his view, the rule of law mechanism must act primarily as a deterrent – to deter some other European leaders from acting foolishly. Grošelj pointed to the need for independence of state and regulatory institutions that scrutinise the work of the executive, “If there is no rule of law, then the state cannot function, but it is the choice of each individual politician as to what they will do.”

Joveva also mentioned the division that exists in the political and civil spheres in Slovenia, “They say no one should be excluded, while they are doing exactly that with those who criticise them. They talk about communists being to blame for everything in this world, let alone in our country, while using those very same methods themselves.” Šarec believes that Slovenia is not divided into two equal parts, “Seventy-five per cent of people think along centrist lines and entirely in line with EU values. They don’t care about politics enough to fight about it. That can only happen if someone provokes it.” At the same time, everyone thinks it is important, above all, to have a forward-looking view.

Stéphane Séjourné also commented on current developments in Ukraine by saying, “Diplomacy has done everything to avoid the events that could happen in Ukraine in the coming days. The talks must go on, but serious sanctions must also be adopted which are being discussed at the EU level at the moment.” He said that despite the government control of the media, public opinion in Russia is not sympathetic to what is going on in Ukraine:

“President Putin is a man of the 20^th century, he is nostalgic and misses Russia’s greatness. He uses the tricks of old dictatorships, which have already failed, for instance, the manipulation of public opinion and of elections.”

Séjourné believes that the Ukrainian crisis is about the borders of the European Union and that we are also defending the Ukrainian people and their right to sovereignty and self-determination. Concerns are also justified for the Baltic states bordering Russia.

At the end of the round-table discussion, Stéphane Séjourné added, “At the moment, there are two different visions of society. We wish to avoid slipping into illiberalism or the decline of certain countries. I don’t want to dramatize it, but it’s really a referendum. These elections have a European momentum. We need to mobilise and motivate young people, who are difficult to engage today, because democracy is taken for granted. We were born into it, and we don’t know what it’s like to live without democracy. We must say that what we have achieved is the result of national struggles, revolutions, and the struggle for the independence of countries. We can lose all of this very quickly – we can see the instability in Russia and Ukraine and how societies can change completely. It’s always easier to demolish than to build.”

 

It is important to get experience. One absolutely needs experience. Who will hire you if you haven’t got professional experience? Experience, experience, experience… Work experience is of high value. Of course, it can be, but bills, too, can literally be of high value. And experience will not cover them.

The European Commission dedicated 2022 to young people. Let us have the European Year of Youth, it said. Great! It is right to put young people at the heart of European policy-making. This should be the case even in the absence of the pandemic, which has robbed them of so many opportunities.

We talk a lot about young people in the European Parliament. A considerable number of documents, resolutions, reports, acts and pieces of legislation are adopted in this regard. During this plenary session, we voted on the report entitled Empowering European youth – post-pandemic employment and social recovery. This is precisely because of the designation of this year as the European Year of Youth.

Basically, the document is a very good starting point for young people. It addresses the importance of strengthening European youth, investing in them, developing specific programmes to tackle youth unemployment and promoting new solutions for their social inclusion. It offers young people opportunities aimed at facilitating labour market inclusion, developing skills for the future, improving integration and access to education.

Great! But unfortunately, the report contains a huge black mark. The unpaid (!!!) traineeships. This is what I am referring to in the first paragraph.

The issue of unpaid traineeships has been on the EU’s agenda for many years now, but it has never been resolved once and for all. This is largely due to the proponents of the laissez-faire principle and of economic (neo)liberalism, who argue that the state cannot and should not interfere with the economy. The proponents of unpaid traineeships justify their position by arguing — listen to this — that young people willingly choose this form of work. 🤨

Such people seem to regard every individual in the jobs market as equal, but at the same time they are deliberately oblivious to the obvious inequalities between them.

The fact is that during their education – and later, during their first job search – young people are placed in a very uncomfortable position. They are forced to do unpaid traineeships through forms of soft coercion. Either because their educational programme requires them to undertake a traineeship in order to graduate successfully, or because, when entering the labour market, potential employers require them to have work experience before they can even get their first job. A paradox in all its glory.

Traineeships are not a choice. Fifty per cent of all young people in the EU undertake unpaid traineeships. And as we know that doing a traineeship is in reality doing the work of a regular employee, this half of young people are deprived of their rights and taken advantage of by employers.

What is more, unpaid traineeships perpetuate the cycle of “privilege for the privileged”. Why? Because it is only middle- and upper-class people who do not have to worry about rent, food, transport and all other living costs who can afford to undertake unpaid traineeships. But if a student cannot afford to work without being paid, they are automatically deprived of the skills that would enable them to get a better job in the future. This puts them in a fundamentally unequal position. So much for the argument of equality of individuals in the labour market.

Young people MUST have equal opportunities. And a PAID traineeship is a step in the right direction.

During this term, we have already taken an important step towards abolishing unpaid traineeships in October 2020, when we voted on this in the context of the Youth Guarantee Resolution. At that time, I was proud to see 574 votes in favour of ending unpaid traineeships. Today, however, I am deeply disappointed. Firstly, because the report allowed unpaid traineeships in the first place, and even more so because the amendment calling for their ban was not supported in yesterday’s vote.

Absolutely unbelievable. It is utterly shameful that we have taken such a retrograde step, particularly in the current situation.

If years are being dedicated to the young generation, then we must prove all the more that we care. This time we have failed. But I believe that we — the ones who REALLY care — will succeed one day.

— IRENA